Benjamin Disraeli wrote that "those who did not understand race will never understand history" and a European whose name I forget predicted in the l9th century that "the U.S. would conquer Mexico and be destroyed." The Aryan conquerors of Mexico in the 1840s were much wiser than we are today, for they already knew the truth of Disraeli's statement. Thus did Aryan-ruled America annex the least-populated parts of Mexico, even though many Mexicans wanted them to annex all of the country to have done with mestizo misrule. But Aryan Americans wanted no part of populous Mexico with its ungovernable, unproductive, corrupt and prolific mestizo inhabitants. Thus was the European's dire prediction confounded until this century of the "Pox Judaica".
Now that the Zionist bankster government in the District of Corruption has decreed that North America, including Canada, the U.S.A. and Mexico will join in economic/political union whether we like it or not, it behooves us to consider the cost of adopting the entire mestizo population of Mexico in addition to the hordes already within our borders. One Zogling in the Pentagon's War College let slip the fact that Mexico nearly 'self-destructed' into chaos and civil war in the 1980s due to endemic corruption and mismanagement plus the omnipresent mestizo population explosion. He said the C.I.A. "had warned Americans of this danger." Well, he and his fellow Pentagonian Zoglings may have received the C.I.A.'s warning, but few other Americans did, to my knowledge, for the likelihood of another violent outburst of the kind which racked Mexico from 1910 to 1929 hardly seemed "newsworthy" to the U.S. jewsmedia.
History, as Santayana warned us, is repeated by those who do not learn it. We should therefore consider what brought about the so-called Mexican Revolution of 1910 and the carnage that followed. Mexico under the Aztecs had a workable, albeit bloody-minded, system of birth control. Tribal wars were the 'national sport' and prisoners were taken for blood sacrifices. Thus were the natives occupied when the Spaniards came and committed two cardinal blunders: they stopped the human sacrifices and they miscegenated, thus producing a crazy, mixed-up population which bred like 'piranha-bunnies'.
Porfirio Diaz, one of Juarez' mestizo generals, but typical, ruled Mexico for 34 peaceful and prosperous years until he was forced to flee the country in 1910. He died of old age in France, whose armies he had fought under Juarez. Porfirio Diaz wanted Mexico to progress. He saw, wherever he looked, that Mexico's Indian heritage and population were preventing Mexico from becoming a wealthy and powerful country. Even having lost some two-thirds of its territory to the United States, Mexico was large, rich in natural resources and well-situated for world trade. Its climate and soil were well-suited to a broad spectrum of agricultural production.
Except for the Indian factor, Diaz saw no reason why Mexico should remain a poor and backward country. Thus did he encourage the immigration of Whites into Mexico, along with U.S. and European investment capital. Under Diaz, most of Mexico's railroads and factories were built. Public works projects, such as water systems, roads, bridges, telegraph and telephone systems, public transportation services and other attributes of Aryan civilization were eagerly introduced throughout the country. In 1910, Mexico was becoming a modern, Aryanized state. In that year, Diaz was at the height of his achievements. Unlike most Latin American dictators, Diaz took care to keep the armed forces small, cheap and always under his watchful control. The Mexican Treasury had a large surplus, in gold, and it would appear that Diaz himself was not only patriotic, but honest, in comparison to all of his successors up to the present. Naturally, he was surprised when the inevitable explosion came.
What caused Mexico to self-destruct in 1910? The most important factor was the incredible mestizo population explosion. Diaz had undone himself to some extent by introducing water purification plants and hygienic water distribution systems in so many Mexican towns and cities. This otherwise thoughtful and patriotic measure drastically reduced the normal infant death rate and contributed to the population explosion. In those days, the United States did not serve as a safety-valve for Mexico's fast-breeding mestizo population, so the pressure built up quickly. Not only is Mexico still plagued by this problem of mestizo-locusts, we in the U.S.A. are also suffering from the swarms which have invaded our living space.
Another fatal flaw in Diaz' Mexico was the adoption of 'supply-side economics' or the 'trickle-down theory'. The idea was and is that if the rich can become very, very rich, some of the wealth will 'trickle down' into the hands of the less-wealthy. As the money pours into the hands of the rich, it is fondly hoped that some of their pockets will overflow or that a moneybag will burst and sprinkle some means of exchange throughout the economy. Ah, fond and baseless hope! Up until 1910, some Mexicans and foreigners grew quite rich, just as the Milkens and Boeskys (both jews) prospered in the 1980s here in the U.S. But 'supply-side economics' did not bring about general prosperity, either in the United States of today or in the Mexico of 1910. Why did Diaz adopt such a disastrous policy? Well, he was, after all, only a mestizo soldier, so he respected economists who claimed to be 'up-to-date' and 'progressive'. Even Aryans have been fooled by glib con-men who are adept at economic jargon and are capable of performing marvelous feats of statistical 'jew-jitsu'. Non-Aryan Franklin D. Roosevelt called his 'advisors' "brain-trusters" and Diaz called his "los cientificos" ("the scientists"), regardless of the bad advice they gave their respective employers.
History teaches those of us who will learn that the two fatal flaws in 1910 Mexico were primarily the non-White population explosion and secondarily, a defective economic policy adopted by the government. These two fatal flaws will preclude any 'rescue operation' for present day Mexico or the United States as assuredly as the iceberg and the enormous gash in the hull sank the TITANIC. Unless we in the U.S. solve the racial/population problem and adopt sound economic policies, this country will go under, too. Our Zionist Occupation Government in the District of Corruption is merely running the (money) pumps faster and playing the music louder to distract us from the dark waves which lap around our ankles.
Enlightened self-interest is an alien concept to the mestizo mind. What is produced by the mestizos' shortsighted greed and rapacious reproductive instincts is a country from which rich and poor alike must flee; the poor to seek employment and the rich to protect and to enjoy their largely ill-gotten gains. The mestizos' nightmare is that they will find only other Mexicos in their flight. This nightmare becomes reality wherever the mestizos gather in sufficient numbers to overwhelm Aryan society, as has happened in parts of California, Texas and other states. The mestizo recreates Mexican corruption and poverty unavoidably, for they are inherent parts of his genetic makeup. He brings Mexico with him, no matter how much he wants to escape it and he imposes Mexican conditions upon us, much as swamps impose mosquitos on those who dwell nearby.
U.S. citizens fleeing San Diego, California, report that they cannot find jobs which pay even the minimum wage, because swarms of mestizos cross the nearby Mexican border every day to work in the San Diego area and U.S. employers can pay them less than the officially-required minimum wage. This means survival in terms of Mexican living standards, but such low wages allow no one to partake of U.S. living standards.
The mestizo mentality is, in regard to shortsighted greed, rife in the North American business community which cannot see reality much beyond their quarterly balance sheets. In order to "reduce labor costs", U.S. businessmen and farmers import mestizo workers and/or move their operations into Mexico, the source of North America's "cheapest" labor supply. Although these policies may look profitable in the short run, they only serve to prove the adage that "there is no such thing as cheap labor". Mestizos erode the U.S. tax base and burden tax-payer supported social services, so it is the U.S. tax-payer who must make up the difference for what any employer "saves" by hiring mestizos. Mestizo labor is a large net loss for the U.S. economy and lowers the U.S. standard of living. Such employers only care about "saving money". They couldn't care less what it costs U.S. society when they import mestizos into the country and export jobs out of the U.S. A truly "national" government would stop these traitors in their tracks, but none exists right now to govern the U.S.A. There is only the Z.O.G. composed of criminal Jews and their Goy stooges.
Criminal folly is, however, eventually corrected, for there is an inherent justice in the scheme of things, no matter how criminally fools wish to behave. It is therefore only fair to warn those who want "free trade" with Mexico that there is ultimately no escape from Say's Law (Jean Baptiste Say, 1767-1832) which states that those who produce must be paid sufficient to buy the products they make, whether it be in a local or world economy. This means that if only Mexican wages are paid for products, these products must eventually and inescapably be sold at Mexican prices, not U.S. prices. Otherwise they will not be sold and there will be no point in making them. As for the unemployed in Canada and the U.S., who have lost their jobs to Mexicans, it is unlikely that they can buy these goods, even at Mexican prices. So much for "cheap labor".
The concentration of wealth into the hands of a rich minority has never produced prosperity, only poverty and instability, as we have seen throughout Latin America, Asia, Africa, Europe and the U.S.A. The rich few cannot consume the products of world industry, even if they would like to. Thus they have a vast surplus of purchasing power which will not be spent to absorb the vast inventories of world economic production. The rich will only buy so many cars, houses, yachts and so much food and clothing. Although Imelda Marcos did her best to consume world footwear production, even her heroic efforts were unsuccessful. What can be done with the huge surplus of production?
For several decades, the rich have resorted to two short-term schemes to sell these products at a profit: money-lending and tapping the tax-payers. Because U.S. workers are generally paid insufficient real wages to buy the products of their labor, this wage-price gap has been "filled" by credit. Most U.S. workers must borrow money to meet the barest requirements of food, clothing, shelter and transportation. If they have children or illness, it is a certainty that a median U.S. family with two wage-earners will be in debt. Prices and taxes seem to preclude saving money "to make ends meet" in today's Judeo-America.
But even credit or money-lending to individuals is insufficient to absorb the excess productivity, so the rich lobby governments to use the tax-payers' money to buy the otherwise unsaleable (at current prices) items. This is why the rich see nothing wrong in welfare states and 'foreign aid' programs, as long as they do not have to fund them. The same applies to war materiel and weapons production which profit the rich as they impoverish the tax-payers. When foreign countries want to buy products, but lack the money to do so, they are lent the necessary funds by the various tentacles of the world bankster community. These loans are often "insured" by the U.S. tax-payers, so the rich can only gain – in the short run. The late Roman Empire was similarly afflicted by such shortsighted economic policies and it is unlikely that many wealthy members of Roman society remained rich after the Empire's collapse, which they helped bring about more effectively than any barbarian invasion. History teaches us that contemporary rich people will face social collapse and chaos in "the long run", which will probably occur within our own lifetimes.
The tax-payers are becoming unemployed or are earning less. Borrowing money at interest is becoming dangerous for the individual and the world economy, for either the lenders must stop lending or money will have no value. This is the inescapable penalty for usury, for the money lent and the interest charged do not represent productivity. They only represent the profit motive of the lender and the need of the borrower. If properly used and created, money represents the supply of goods and services in the economy, as a measure of value, like honest weights and measures. It is or should be a means of exchange, not a tool of speculation, just as no one is allowed to speculate on the length of a yard or the volume of a quart. Bankster-created inflation and deflation of our money supply is robbery. When a worker has earned the wages of an eight-hour day and is later told that his money is only worth that of a six-hour day, someone has stolen two hours of that worker's life and productivity. It is not too difficult to identify the culprit. "Find the jew", to paraphrase the incorrect French expression.
There is no substitute for saving, but nobody does that these days, largely because of our debt-based economy. Were we to adopt an economy based on productivity, as the German National Socialists did, saving would be both possible and desirable. Putting your jewish money into a bank, savings & loan, real estate, stocks, bonds, mutual funds, etc. these days is really gambling, not saving, and you will need all the luck you can get to keep the wolf from the door and the shirt on your back.
In the short run, our jobs are going south and what has passed for prosperity here in the U.S. is going with them. The mestizos will keep on coming north until the last vestiges of Aryan civilization in U.S. territory are destroyed. The European's dire prediction will be fulfilled when we have finally incorporated Mexico into the U.S. economy. In reality, we are witnessing Mexico's conquest of North America and it means disaster for all concerned. Race is everything. It is dangerous and uncomfortable even to be rich in a mestizo society.