19 March 2003 — Eric Thomson – If I Were President.
Before I address the many important items you have mentioned, I will relate a recent conversation I had with an Anglo-mestizo who came into my eating place several times. After a few drinks this evening, he waxed 'patriotic' and told me he had served with the U.S. Navy in the first Gulf Massacre of Iraqis, and thereby escaped the Gulf War Syndrome which affected ground personnel. He told me that we were bombing Iraq to defend our "freedom". I asked him if he thought we had more freedom, or less, after 9-11. He changed the subject by praising the U.S. landscape. I agreed that the landscape was fine, but that was true of most places I have lived in on this planet. After he had unwound his spiel sufficiently, I told him that this country had the only government on this planet that ever lied to me. I said that I was very easy to get along with. All a government needs to do is tell me what is forbidden, and I will abide by their rules, or leave. What I discovered, in the case of the U.S.A., was that it actually encouraged people to exercise their rights and duties as citizens, and then clobber them for it! Even regular banana republics, in which I've lived, do not encourage people to break the 'rules', but this big banana republic does so. His reply was that I should go back to wherever I came from. I said, one place is as good as another, and the only reason I returned to "Usrael" was that my research contracts dried up, but I refuse to go back to Bakersfield CA, where I was born!

Usually, where I am, things happen. It's nothing to do with me, for I am not the causal agent, but often, I find myself in the middle of a show, and act as a participant. It's as if I have been selected for some kind of training course, in international relations, on the postgraduate level. I am interested in seeing how and when all this education may be put to use. Am I The Chosen One? Consider the many coups d'etat we have had in this country: The subversion of the so-called American-Revolution by banksters, shackling us again to the Judeo-British Empire; the genocidal Civil War; the Assassination of Lincoln, before he could repatriate the Blacks to Africa; the rise of U.S. imperialism in 1898; the revolutionary changes within the U.S.A. during both world wars; The reversal of JFK's war and economic policies after his assassination; the strange departure of Nixon, &c. Quite in keeping with Judeo-Freemasonic tactics, the institutions, like the facades they really are, remain intact, but behind the facades, new policies and new personages operate, taking the population into new channels, without their knowledge nor their consent. We are not a democracy, remember? The titles of such persons as President, Vice President, &c. remain unchanged, but would President Washington recognize President Bush and his office as anything on par with his executive powers at the founding of the U.S.A.? I am addressing his legal, constitutional powers, not his military weapons of mass-destruction.

This country is definitely in crisis, regardless of the fact that the vast majority do not want to know. Apparently, there is major disagreement between the U.S. military and the Secretary of Defense, I suspect over lack of funds to pursue the ZOG's military adventures. Are there any brave, competent, influential people who put the interests of this country's people ahead of Israel and the Anglo-American petro-banksters? We shall see.

Rommel demanded that anyone who came to him with a complaint must also bring him 3 possible solutions to the problem he is complaining about. What would I do, if I were suddenly President of the U.S.A., as it now stands?

If I Were President –

Our kosher economy is worse than a Ponzi scam, for even Ponzi paid his dupes with value. Greenspan and his tribe pay with I.O.U.s! Our economic reform must begin from the ground up, for the creation of money cannot be based on either need or greed, but upon productivity. I would take up that principle enunciated by that 'great humanitarian' Vladimir Illych Ulyanov, alias "Lenin": "Those who do not work shall not eat!" Regardless of race, we can no longer afford to fund social parasites, including prison inmates. "If you can't feed, don't breed!" would become the rule. Our industries have disappeared and our infrastructure has decayed. A viable society requires diversity, economic diversity, so we must restore our 3 economic sectors, especially manufacturing, to provide employment and political-economic independence from foreign sources, exactly as Germany's National Socialist government did, with far fewer resources than we have. Naturally, we would get out of the drug business. Those who now engage in this business would be deemed perpetrators of chemical warfare against the U.S. population. In regard to overall efficiency, the standards for recruiting sports players would apply: if one cannot make the grade, his color, gender and disabilities would not qualify him for a job which requires merit, rather than melanin.

Illegal immigrants would be deemed enemy invaders, and dealt with accordingly. The amalgamation of Mexico with the U.S.A. would be stopped and reversed, with positive and negative incentives. Citizenship would require the performance of duties, first, before rights. Birth would not automatically confer citizenship. You get my drift.

Obviously, freedom of association would be restored. In little Rhodesia, this freedom existed on a practical basis. Half the country was reserved for Blacks, and non-Blacks had to have permits to enter Black territory. Blacks could, however, enter non-Black territory, although The Land Tenure Act permitted Whites, Asians and Coloureds (mixed race) to live in their own areas, like Blacks, so they could be amongst themselves. Public places, like pubs and hotels,were segregated on a star-rating basis. Two-star hotels, for example, were restricted to Blacks, Whites, Coloureds or Asians, but 5-star hotels were open to everyone who cared to enter. Such places were frequented by the upperclass Blacks, Whites, et al. Naturally, 5-star establishments maintained certain standards of decorum in terms of dress and behavior. Regardless of race, no scruffy persons were admitted, and no rowdies allowed. The same applied to schools. No one was required to mix with racial aliens, and he was free to mix or not, as a matter of personal taste.

The festering problem of so-called Indians in the U.S.A. would be dealt with swiftly. Tribes would retain their present lands, but all Indians would be deemed citizens and the tribes would be deemed corporations, not sovereign governments with extra-territorial rights. Tribe members would become shareholders, under their elected boards of directors, whatever they wish to call them. The Great White Father would get out of the nanny business, and the "Indians" would stand or fall as adult members of U.S. society.

All legal persons would pay no more than 10% of their total annual incomes, but I would go one step further than Forbes: legal persons would include all corporations and trusts, which have so far enjoyed exemptions.

The penal system would be reformed quite simply, by changing the emphasis from punishment and rehabilitation to redemption, in which the offender earns his way back into society. The motto would be: "Work Makes You Free!" Capital punishment would be enforced on the basis of equality: if one is sufficiently competent to murder someone, he is sufficiently competent to be tried as a sane, responsible adult. Mental incapacity and age would no longer be licences to kill, as they are now. Race would not be considered as any exemption from one's responsibility and culpability.

As president, I would require no additional laws. The Genocide Convention would be enforced against inter-racial crime and race-mixers, since it is a treaty and has the same power as The U.S. Constitution. The crime of advocating genocide via murder and race-mixing would merit the same punishment as meted out to those accused of genocide at Nuremberg: death by hanging.

On matters of foreign policy, the U.S. government will not put Israel first, nor any interests whose loyalties do not put the U.S. people first. On domestic matters, there will be created, for the first time in U.S. history, a public interest, as expressed in The U.S. Constitution and various state constitutions. This means that "the general welfare" would take precedence over individual welfare, at the expense of the general welfare, as we see now, from top to bottom of this anti-social, Jeffersonian-anarchist society. The public interest will supersede short-term profiteering at public expense.

Wages and prices will be brought into line, for it is in the public interest that workers enjoy a civilized standard of living. Food, clothing, shelter and automobiles have NEVER been cheaper to make than they are today, so these products of the workers will be affordable, without the worker becoming a debt-slave, simply to acquire those things he has produced. The oil racketeers would be deemed economic saboteurs and dealt with as we would deal with those who wage war upon our people and our economy.

The Constitution would be restored with the abolition of the privately-owned Federal Reserve. The U.S. government would take over the entire banking system, in terms of the relevant articles. Lending money at interest privately would be deemed counterfeiting and punished accordingly, with cash rewards to informants. All loans would be made in terms of the general welfare. Upon this basis, the banker would decide whether we need a school or a casino, for instance. By taking over the creation of money, which is done by lending as well as by printing, the U.S.A. would be a sovereign country at last.

These are a few of the solutions which come immediately to mind, and I'm sure my advisors could think of many more ideas toward achievement of the common good, the common defence and the general welfare. Do I fantasize? Not at all, for if these programs are not implemented, there will not be a U.S.A., either in law or in fact, but even if things devolve along present lines, ORION will remain our ultimate goal.

I am intrigued by the download from The Jewish Telegraph Agency, in regard to the kike who has been arrested for attempting to smuggle U.S. missile parts INTO the U.S.A. Obviously, these U.S. missile parts came from Israel, gifts from the U.S. tax-payers. The sheenie's stories are nonsense. If he intended to ship the parts to China, why smuggle them into the U.S.A.? He then claims that he might sell such parts more cheaply to the U.S. military, than from the U.S. military's normal suppliers. Would this be possible, since Israel gets the missiles free, but the U.S. military must pay its domestic civilian suppliers? That is likely, but why claim the original destination as China? Could this be another kosher false flag operation, in which U.S. missiles are used against U.S. targets? Obviously, jewish sources reveal much more than the Goy-feed doled out by the U.S. jewsmedia. I suspect this story will quickly be filed in The Memory Hole. If this country had a national government, instead of a ZOG, we might unravel another Mossad 9-11 plot.

Obviously, dual citizens, including sheenies, would have no place in U.S. government, either, on behalf of our sovereignty and our nationhood. Under my presidency, the U.S.A. would become a nation as well as a democracy, for the first time in its history. The predatory, parasitic plutocracy will go the way of ZOG, down the toilet of history, if the U.S.A. will exist in fact and in name.

With our present demography, the territory now called The U.S.A. will naturally be divided along ethnic lines. I would favor a peaceful separation, unlike that which created the states of India and Pakistan. People have a natural tendency to be with their own kind. As for those who want to be with other kinds, they would be free to do so, as long as the others want such people in their midst. The Rhodesian example would work here. Once biopolitical territories were formed, they would be self-governing and self-supporting. The U.S. Government would function on behalf of mutually-acceptable policies, and any biopolitical territory could exercise its veto by secession. I would foresee turf-conflicts as most pressing problems, and these will be exacerbated by immigration surges, in particular from Hispano-America and Asia, as are now occurring under ZOG. The advantage for Whites after ZOG is that they will have the right to their own piece of U.S. territory, unlike the ZOG status quo. Right is insufficient without might to defend White territory, for biopolitical facts would naturally take precedence over legal fictions, but I would hope the transition could be done in a peaceful, orderly manner, for the mutual benefit of all concerned, rather than being a ZOG empire which is ruled against the interests of the governed, as at present. The territory inhabited by Mexicans would likely join up with Mexico, for land belongs to those who occupy it, in fact and in law. Under ZOG, Mexico will annex the entire U.S.A., minus the Chinese colonies, of course, and there will be no place for Whitey. If Whitey wants to abandon this continent, that is up to him, and if he wants to retain part of it, that is also up to him. The latter decision depends upon Whitey achieving self-determination and self-government, for under ZOG there is only extinction ahead, and we are paying for this with our taxes!


Your revelation that Saddam now takes only Euros for Iraqi oil does not surprise me, although I heard nothing about it in the jewsmedia. Isn't it consistent that this issue which has sparked so many wars and assassinations is so assiduously hushed up by the powers that be? By this step, Saddam has assured himself of allies in the fight for freedom from the "New World Order". I am sure the Chinese know what advantages the Euro and Iraqi oil would bring them, and so do the former soviet Khazars who choose to keep the rump portion of their Red Russian Empire livable and governable. I see lots of mutual interests involved in this Iraqi matter, even if I lack many details. The ZOG is clearly a minority interest group, which now stands very much against the interests of the vast majority on this planet. How long can ZOG coerce its unwilling subjects here, there and everywhere? What does ZOG have to offer? Bombs and I.O.U.s do not satisfy those with nothing to lose, and we are breeding more and more of those every minute.

Regarding the Bantu influx: I, who have a memory, remember how de-colonialization was supposed to create paradise on earth. No longer would the wogs and nignogs be 'oppressed' by evil White masters. Since we are all 'equal', all of us are capable of self-government and productivity. Post-colonial standards of living were supposed to improve, for the brilliant, hard-working natives would no longer see their fruits of labor exploited and exported for the benefit of their alien masters. According to FDR, decolonization would be a bowl of cherries. We who lived in the days of empire have seen the reality: the self-governing natives produce more want than their corruption, stupidity and inefficiency can satisfy. Hence, they are colonizing the lands of their former White masters, for food is where Whitey is, and they will kill Whitey to get it!

The folly of Judeo-Christian "rapture bunnies" who think they can serve Satan on behalf of Jesus is a monument to their insanity and stupidity, for their motives are entirely selfish. As I recall from Christian mythology, Jesus was made a similar offer by Satan, but Jesus refused to rule the world in the temporal sense. Judeo-Christians believe that, by serving the minions of Satan, as identified by Jesus, they can hasten the return of Jesus. Joining the enemy is hardly the way to win for one's own side. A Chinese parable refers: A sage who lived in a city which was besieged had been asked why he did not join the city's defenders to fight the enemy outside the gates. The sage replied that it was folly to fight the enemy outside, when the enemy was already inside!

Others agree that Iraq will provide Israel with the opportunity to commit atrocities against the Semites, in order to advance the creation of Eretz Israel, from the Tigris to the Nile. But what if their latest golem, "Usrael", stumbles and crumbles into the mud from which it was made? stay tuned! FEDZOGUSA could collapse overnight.

In regard to weaponry, I am not a gun collector. I agree that rapid-fire, small caliber firearms are mainly show-biz props for kiddies, not killers. They can make lots of noise, waste lots of ammo, and produce little damage to their human targets. In the category of self-defence weapons, I would choose a small, easily-concealed magnum derringer, with penetrating and stopping power, for use against determined enemies close up. A good intermediate weapon would be a .357 magnum revolver with dum dum bullets, as favored by the Denver police, if I recall correctly. The latest on the market, which I would also recommend, would be the .50 caliber magnum revolver, to cope with varmints, grizzly bears and annoying aircraft. For dealing with numerous assailants at close quarters, I would recommend a 12 gauge shotgun, with a sturdy bayonet, for finishing off wearers of body armor, when they get knocked down. Long guns should suffice to deal with body-armor-wearing enemies at longer distances. The .30-.30 is reputedly effective in the stopping and penetration department. Basically, there is no good substitute for reliability and proper aim. Che Guevara recommended bolt action rifles because they did the job and saved ammo. Hebrewood has created the fantasy that a six-shooter could be fired without reloading, and, for the sake of entertainment, no one ever seems to run out of ammunition, even when they fire off a truckload of ammo. Reality is much different. The object is to waste the enemy, not the ammo. As I understand, contemporary assassins favor the common .22 pistol which fires .22 longs. Naturally, these cool killers aim for vital spots, usually headshots. I have seen silly movies in which the actors use short-barrel pistols and revolvers with telescopic sights. I have seen "silencers" on revolvers, which is an oxymoron. The only revolver which can be silenced is the Russian Nagant, which effectively sealed the chambers by having them seat into the barrel. Once again, it is not the cosmetic appearance of any weapon. It is the effects it produces on the target. standard rifles of both world wars can easily penetrate the walls of most buildings. I have sawed saddles into telephone poles with an M-1 Garand, and I have demolished a single course brick wall with a 98 K, the standard German military rifle of WWI and WWII, to illustrate. The jew hoax at Auschwitz called The Wall of Death, where "many thousands" were allegedly shot by firing squads, and which shows no bullet holes nor pockmarks. I told The Zud that a single volley from ten rifles would cause such a wall to topple, as the bullets passed through the people being shot. The Zud doubted, so we built such a wall and videotaped the results to my satisfaction. The Zud was never a soldier and I was, so my prediction was based on experience and it made great footage in our anti-Holohoax program entitled "Genocide by Propaganda". I visited the real Wall of Death in Barcelona's customs house, which has thick walls of granite used as a backstop by firing squads in the Spanish Civil War. The granite is scarred, as if madmen had attacked it with picks. The guard told me what had happened there, in a matter-of-fact manner, since it was not a "Holocaust Museum" and there was no admission fee. The marble facades of tall buildings in Barcelona's downtown plazas still bear the pockmarks from rifle fire, that were filled in with what looks like black putty, so they really stand out.

Yes, the jews are vampires who suck their hosts dry and move on. They even brag about their vampire character in the Old Testament, when they gypped the Gypos out of Egypt and supposedly skedaddled with their loot. Mythology reveals character, even if it has no historical basis. Are the jews capable of dreaming better dreams? Apparently not. The jew manipulates symbols to steal our energy and our wealth, and like the jew-dazed vampire victims, we let them do it, and some of us even provide them with active assistance. "They Live." Goyim who think they can also live off symbols are conning themselves. I agree that we must develop skills in the use of solid things, for that's the real world, which does not exist on paper or diskettes.

I have not read Bukowski, but I appreciate your evaluation of his writings. He and Henry Miller echo Omar Khayyam, who favored self-indulgence as the antidote to social b.s. I see no reason for asceticism, but I see no justification for one's disloyalty to his community. Of course, we could abandon our community and become mythical Zarathustras or Thoreaus. The latter wrote much of his self-sufficiency, but was not adverse to receiving lots of picnic goodies from his Boston visitors. Gurus must eat! I am a product of my own self-indulgence, for I have insisted throughout my life in doing what I think is right. Few 'rich' people have this advantage, for one usually has to sellout one's principles, if any, to get rich, and then avoid adherence to principles in order to stay rich. In order for me to become rich, under ZOG, I would have to become someone else, so the riches would no longer be enjoyable to me, as I now am. I see no point in exerting myself to become someone I would not like to live with. The sheenies promote such anti-social viewpoints as profit-making distractions, much like painting a door on a wall, so Goyim will think that is a way out. Self-indulgence to distraction and destruction is no way out of the jews' ZOG-gulag. Collective action is the only way possible.

The current blightwing blather about historical revisionism is relevant only in terms of racial survival. It can serve as a means toward the achievement of such a worthwhile goal, but revisionism is not an end in itself, for then it becomes a game of trivial pursuit for egotists, and one more distraction, which may be added to that of "look-what-they-are-doing-to-us-now." The Zud told me that he would turn the Holohoax into a focus for the building of a pro-Aryan, anti-Zionist ORGANIZATION. As it turned out, he lied, for he used it as a means of self-promotion and not as a means to serve the cause he espoused. "I am not Mr. Holocaust!" he declared, but by his alienation of activists, that's what he became. Another spurned opportunity by a self-styled 'leader'. To those Johnny-come-latelies, I state that I worked with The Zud over 16 years, so I am well-informed about his statements and actions at firsthand, having written many of his statements for him!

I agree that A Great Culling is in store for huge numbers of biped cattle. Let me count the ways... Over-population, environmental depletion and pollution, down- and cross-breeding, disease, famine, war and, most of all, stupidity. The population plague has been greatly assisted in its growth and spread by White 'do-gooders'. They are the foremost enemies of mankind, but a few Mugabes can undo their self-righteous folly in a very short time. The world needs one, two, three, many Robert Mugabes (to paraphrase Che Guevara).

Your observations on using and maintaining computers is confirmation that I should still avoid them, until I have the necessary time and money. My free time is extremely limited, as you know. Were I to get on the 'net, I would have to screen out all the garbage, mischief and idle chit-chat, as well as enter whatever I thought to be of importance. Even if I could work on the computer full-time, I would have to clone myself to handle the volume of correspondence. In ancient times, there was a way to cope with blizzards of correspondence. It was call ORGANIZATION. No individual can do it, regardless of the efficiency of his medium of communication.

It appears that ZOG is adding more jew to Judeo-Christianity, from what you report of the Billy Graham speech. If he were sincere, he would know that he has a fine room awaiting him down in Christian Hell. If I were Jesus and had such 'representatives', I would be annoyed and disgusted.

In regard to The Old Left, I think Joseph Sobran mentioned that jews abandoned liberalism for fascism, after the founding of Zionist Occupied Palestine. This was foretold by Douglas Reed in "Somewhere South of Suez". Reed opined that the Jews would dump Communism in favor of Zionism. As I try to tell the Goyim, the jew will use any doctrine as a tool, toward the construction of his jew-supremacist monstrosity: Zionism. Old Lefties need to grow up and check out reality, rather than pine away for the past and 'what might have been'. Those who cannot cope with reality will be consumed by it. How many lefties know they have been 'jewed'?

As I watched the carousing Goy cattle at work this evening, I realized how little they cared to know what is coming down upon them. As crises loom, their response is to consume and indulge themselves, ever more frantically. I don't think they are having a good time, for there is an apparent desperation to their consumption and dissipation. On the upscale economic level, I see people with building plans, renovating and augmenting their cabins on The Titanic, as the others party. Can these apparently educated people be so oblivious to their dangerous circumstances? Knowledgeable Whites tell me that "nothing can be done". Yes it can, but not if we all take that defeatist attitude. What I saw in Rhodesia does not reassure me about my race in North America. Worse is not better, and truth frees no one, if we sit and do nothing. Those who do not fight collectively will suffer individually.