The best way to keep our troops safe and supported is to bring them back to defend the territory of the U.S.A. It is definitely not supporting our troops to send them into harm's way in Arabia and Afghanistan, while letting Arabs and Afghans into the U.S.A.
Let's see if we may derive some useful lessons from the past, our imperial adventure in Vietnam, for example. We were lied to by 'our' government which told us that Red Russia and Red China were allies. We were lied to by 'our' government that Asian countries were like dominoes, which would fall, one by one, into the 'growing shadow of monolithic Communism', even when it became obvious that Red China would not support the Vietnamese Soviet client state. Dominoes, indeed! The ostensible pretext for sending our troops to Vietnam was The Tonkin Gulf Incident, an admitted lie, told us by ZOG. Once again, how would we have best supported our troops in Vietnam? By getting them back home, on the double, and by impeaching the liar, Johnson.
Promoters of The Jew World Ordure call those who do not favor imperialism "isolationists". This is specious logic, for the U.S.A. had world trade long before we conquered parts of the Spanish Empire, and became imperialists ourselves, even though the founders of the U.S.A. were an imperialist elite, like that of Britain. An empire is a multi-national entity ruled by an alien minority. This was first achieved within Britain, under Cromwell, and within the U.S.A., under Hamilton and his kosher cronies and masonic malefactors. From those origins, our imperial rulers are comprised of plutocratic race-traitors and their alien masters. Yes, Virginia, there is a ZOG, for our rulers are jew-supremacists, that is, Zionists, whether they are jews or not.
The "One World" concept is a Marxist creation. Yes, we all live on one planet, but does this mean that the 'haves' are obliged to sacrifice their land and living standards to support an infinitely-breeding world-mass of 'have-nots', so that we all must go down to their levels of squalid, crowded existence? If that is what you want, Mr. Rockefeller, Guggenheim, Rothschild, Warburg et al., then why not share your wealth with "the wretched refuse of the teeming shores", while we live off our much more modest earnings? Marxism has always been promoted by the rich, for they will not pay "according to their ability". That is the job of us taxpaying Goyim.
The Vietnam (undeclared) War revealed another phenomenon within the U.S.A.: the agitation of political interest groups, for whom the troops in Vietnam were irrelevant. The peace movement was able to recruit those who did not want themselves or their sons to be drafted. There was an exodus of draft-age youth into Canada, and to Europe, where I met many American 'students' who were there to party, since European universities allowed admissions, whether the student showed up at lectures or not, and whether he passed exams or not. Many of these legal draft-dodgers were jews, as I saw at firsthand. One fellow was too dumb to get into a U.S. medical school, so he got admitted into the Louvain University as a medical student, where he attended no classes and did no studies, except for observing the effects of guzzling Chericol, a syrupy cough medicine laced with codeine. He told me that his father was a doctor, who was paying his tuition and living expenses and that he would return to the U.S.A. once or twice a year, to deliver undisclosed amounts of cash to his father's Swiss bank account. It was a hard life!
The Vietnam War became a launching platform for domestic Reds and Black Nationalists, and this war serves a similar purpose for additional interest groups, such as Mexican Nationalists who are asserting their claims to "Aztlan", the territories lost to Mexico in 1848, and then some!
Within this biopolitical context, –
the only appropriate slogan is – "Support Our Troops, by getting them home!"
I appreciate your insights and the articles on Bolivia, plus the "Russian" military analysis. It appears that the U.S.-IMF racketeers are making Latin America unlivable, and are goading the population to poverty, desperation and violence. This means a flood of southern muds up to the land of "Usrael", pronto. Were the U.S.A. nonexistent, the problems of Latin America would be bad enough, for their main problem is the infinite reproduction of the bottom layers of their society, and their criminal mismanagement at the top. No political-economic system known to man can cope with the infinite growth of have-nots, as is occurring in Latin America, and the world economic situation is making these problems worse, as manufacturing jobs leave Latin America for China. Argentina has been one of the first victims of bankster-instigated deindustrialization, and Brazil could go the same way. Mexico's maquiladores (assembly plants) are leaving for China, so that country's unemployment will quickly soar, along with the rest of North America. As we saw in Iran, under the Shah, no amount of oil can provide the necessary: jobs there, or here. What we are seeing in "Usrael" is falling wages, growing job scarcity and rising prices, which I guess are due to an expectation of galloping inflation, on the part of retailers. My recent shopping trip to Walmart was more expensive than last time, for exactly the same number of items. How can it be otherwise, when FEDZOGUSA spends money it does not have, and cuts taxes? How can we increase expenditures and debt, while lowering our income necessary to pay for all of it? The ZOG is behaving worse than the legendary Indian who wanted a longer blanket, so he cut one foot off the bottom and sewed it on the top. ZOG is 'lengthening' its blanket by cutting it down the middle and separating the two halves, thus covering nothing. Meanwhile, the jobs flow to China and the Chinese flow in. I am beginning to believe that the jews have made such a deal with the Chinese: They pay for their invasion of North America with manufactured goods, and ZOG lets them take over the continent. As my professor used to say, "There are no big secrets." If we observe demographic changes on this continent, that is obvious. Meanwhile, we fritter away the last of our military forces in the sand, on behalf of Israel. I noted that the jews had a pro-war demonstration in Jew York City yesterday, The Goyim never seem to catch on, for even the old peacenik song asks, "when will they ever learn?"
In regard to the "Russian" military analysis, which I found informative about new ZOG weapons, designed to fight a non-infantry war, I agree that one reason for bashing Iraq is to test these weapons. I disagree that weapons-testing is the principal reason, however, for I believe that this war is being waged on behalf of Israel, for oil, water and territory. The U.S. ZOG-mercs are likely to be in what remains of Iraq for a longer time than the "Russian" predicts. I also note that ZOG-merc ground forces have been resisted by armed military units in Iraqi towns and cities, according to BBC radio news reports. So much for a "no-contact" or stand off war. An occupation of Iraq is likely to be a war of attrition, as in Afghanistan, with endless guerrilla actions against ZOG-merc forces, who cannot stand many casualties, much like their jewish masters. Getting in is fairly easy. Occupying is the troublesome part. As for Iraqi oil helping the U.S. economy, our "Russian" had better think again. The U.S. government could pay for Chinese goods with oil, but what do the people of "Usrael" use for money, if they are jobless? Perhaps we could all join the military forces of the Jew World Ordure, as many Americans did to flee the Big Jew Depression of the thirties, but I very much doubt it.
The oil-producing countries could switch to Euros and dump their petro-dollars, if they wanted to bring ZOG to its knees. I understand from an unconfirmed source that Iraq has already done so. Another peculiar news item was that Iraq is still pumping oil to Turkey, which seems to be rather belligerent in northern Iraq, much to the discomfort of the U.S. and its Kurdish allies. I am reminded of the movie, "March or Die", in which a French Foreign Legion officer inadvertently unifies the Arab tribes against the French occupation authorities. The Iraqi representative in Cairo addresses what he calls "the Arab Nation", which is notorious for its disunity, but may become united if the ZOG keeps pummeling them. As it appears, all pro-ZOG Arab regimes are unrepresentative of their respective peoples, just as is the ZOG in The District of Corruption. If the U.S.A. were a democracy, rather than a plutocracy, we would have had a referendum on this war, so the majority would have a say in the matter.
DOWZ! & ORION!
P.S.: In regard to my personal funding, I would much prefer that people heed what I say, rather than pay me to say it.