IS THERE A BLACK CHRIST IN YOUR FUTURE?
by Allan Callahan
Liberty Bell, December 1993
The notion of a black Christ may shock most Christians, but they should have expected this to come up, sooner or later. The Reverend Billy Graham said years ago that he didn't look upon Christ as white, but rather, as brown. And more recently, several black Christian spokesmen have said that they can no longer stomach the idea of a white Christ. And if the white population continues to shrink, below the replacement point, as it has, world-wide, since 1978; and darken, as it is doing now, then a black Christ is a virtual certainty, eventually.
The first colored Christ to appear on a large scale will probably be portrayed as a brown man with distinguished-looking Caucasian features. Then he will become a black man, with the same features. But if the white population continues to diminish, and become more niggerized, a more niggerized Christ win also come into being. How does this grab you? Could you worship a nigger god with thick lips, flat nose, sloping forehead, prognathous jaw, kinky hair (complete with dreadlocks), and maybe even with a bone through his nose? Could you revere a fat, "black mammy" type of Virgin Mary? Well, maybe you couldn't, white Christian, but your descendants could, because they will no longer be white, unless some changes are made in current trends. People tend to create gods in their own image.
The church of the years 2200 or 2300 may retain only faint vestiges of the old Christian church. Instead, the music could be the beating of tom-toms; the services, voodoo and dark-of-the-moon stuff, coupled with the beheading of chickens and goats, drinking some of the blood and smearing the rest on their bodies, mixed with cow dung.
Wouldn't a good dose of white pride start turning things around? Yes, if you could get people to listen. But a racialist leader in California said white Christians fought him even harder than Jews and blacks did. They didn't listen.
What a difference time makes! The Founding Fathers considered the Negro to be barely human, as did the clergymen of that era. The church was one of the strongest supporters of slavery, and was very rough on heretics, too. Not that it should be proud of things like its witchcraft trials; it shouldn't be. How did the Christians of that era justify cruelties, like burning people at the stake? Well, they felt that, since God was going to burn the poor sinners in Hell forever anyway, he wouldn't mind if they burned them for an hour or two ahead of time.
Medieval Christians were too cruel, in that they would burn people at the stake, and modem white Christians are too wimpy, in that they are not taking the measures necessary to save their own race. This is especially true of church leaders, and particularly those who go overboard on "humanitarian" ideals. But there was one outstanding exception of recent times – a man who is probably considered the greatest humanitarian of the 20th century. This was Dr. Albert Schweitzer (1875-1965), an Elsatian-German who won fame in four fields: philosophy, music, medicine and theology. At age 30 he became a medical missionary and ran a hospital at Lambarene, Gabon, in what was then French Equatorial Africa.
For sixty years the world press rhapsodized over what Schweitzer was doing for blacks in Africa. He usually read the Bible every evening, and nearly everybody assumed he was a great egalitarian, and a staunch supporter of race-mixing. Those who knew different rarely said anything about it. One journalist noted that Schweitzer had no Negro doctors at his hospital, nor was he training any. Schweitzer said: "You can't change their mentality." Maybe his most astounding statement, though, was made during the Congo campaign (1961), when the United Nations was instrumental in overthrowing the white man's civilization there. Said Schweitzer:
I have given my life to try to alleviate the sufferings of Africa. There is something that all white men who have lived here like I must learn and know: that these individuals are a sub-race. They have neither the intellectual, mental or emotional abilities to equate or to share equally with white men in any of the functions of our civilization.
I have given my life to try to bring unto them the advantages which our civilization must offer, but I have become well aware that we must retain this status: (white) the superior and they the inferior.
For whenever a white man seeks to live among them as their equals they will either destroy him or devour him. And they will destroy all of his work.
Let white men from anywhere in the world, who would come to help Africa, remember that you must continually retain this status; you the master and they the inferior like children that you would help or teach. Never fraternize with them as equals or they will devour you. They will destroy you.
Since Schweitzer had such a low opinion of Negroes it is reasonable to assume that he would have been horrified at the idea of a black Christ And be was dead right about saying you cannot change the mentality of blacks, or whites, either, or Asians, or anyone else. Education can't do it. This can only (up to a point) raise the level of knowledge; it can't change mentality. This is inherited.
Had he known, in 1905, when he first went to Africa, that the Negro population would later explode so dramatically, perhaps be would not have gone at all. Who know?
Blacks in Africa are increasing rapidly. How rapid? A recent report said that the population in Sudan has been doubling every 22 years, so it isn't unreasonable to assume that all the countries of black Africa will double about that quickly also, if they can get the food, and if they can't raise enough or buy the white nations can be expected to send whatever is needed, free of charge.
On top of this, blacks living outside the Dark Continent are also breeding like rats, One difference, though, is that rats take better care of their young. Niggers don't need to worry about caring for their offspring, because, if they don't do it, Whitey will do it for them.
Yes, Whitey tries hard to accommodate them on this. He has reduced his own birthrate below the replacement level so he will have more time and money to spend on pickaninnies.
Aryans need to start thinking some forbidden thoughts on the race question, one of which would be that black genes, if mixed and stirred completely into a universal human genepool, would have the power to pull down all High Culture on this planet.
And even if they aren't mixed into a universal human genepool, but just our own white genepool, it will still mean the end of us. Schweitzer's warning that Negroes can devour us, and destroy us, then come true. If we are annihilated, isn't it very likely that our white god will vanish, too, along with us?
There is one group of whites, who, we can assume, would, right now, readily embrace the idea of a black Christ. A new term has been coined to describe them: "Whiggers" (white niggers). They want to imitate blacks in every way; in dress, speech, actions and thinking. Nearly all of them are young, and some are gang members. Violent white gang members usually love Negro music, but can't explain what it means to them. However, it's simple. Blacks are more violent by nature, and the music, in a subtle way, reflects this nature. Therefore whites, listening to this stuff, will become more violent too. If you lock up some normal people in a room with a fool, they will eventually start acting somewhat like fools themselves. It is association!
White youth has embraced Negro music with open arms, if you can call it "music." Much of it is horrible stuff, about what you would expect from jungle savages. There is a primitive beat, along with a "social message," sometimes put forth with a half-incoherent screeching and caterwauling. The message is often something about "justice," which, in the minds of Negroes, means letting them have their own way. At other times there are inane lyrics. (One song has nothing but the words "I love ya' baby," repeated over and over again.) It is understandable why blacks listen to this crud, but mind boggling to think about whites abusing their eardrums with it.
The thought of Christ turning black might jolt most whites, and especially religious ones, to sensibility on the race question. All except for Whiggers and fawning negrophiles. These people are a waste of skin, and may have to be written off as hopeless. But it should be possible to change most Aryan Christians. After all, if Medieval Christians could give up their practice of burning people at the stake, why couldn't modern Christians give up their practice of race-mixing? Why should one act be any harder than the other? And if anything could accomplish this, it would be the vision, in their minds, of a black Christ gazing down upon a planet devoid of white people.