28 June 2002 – by Calvin
I went and read that article about white nationalists and their need to “tolerate homosexuality.”  The author has a noble intent in that he wishes to remove what he sees as a dividing line in the white movement.  What I think he fails to see is that this line of division isn't the monstrous polarization which he makes it out to be.  Its more like having a long and uncomfortable fingernail.  Yes, its part of my body, but an insignificantly small part, and I won't be too sad when I take my clippers to it.  What Hess advocating is that we tolerate something extremely pernicious to save the 1% of “white nationalists” who prefer the back door.  The building blocks of a nation is the family.  Thus, it seems contradictory for us to ascribe any faggot this title.

Homosexuality is not “beside the point” as the author points out.  He says that not all faggots promote the Jewish agenda.  That may be, but it seems to me that all Jews promote the faggot agenda.  If the jews are asking themselves, “is it good for jews?” then you can be damned well sure that it is NOT GOOD FOR WHITES. The question of whether faggots are acceptable in white society has always been a resounding NO until the jews and their lap dogs turned it into another “issue.”  We have nothing to lose when we adopt the slogan NO FAGS, JUST RIGHT.

Our faggot loving author also tells us that intolerance of homosexuality is jewish.  For a group that gives blowjobs to newborns and disproportionately engages in faggot/paedophile behaviour themselves, I can only suggest that the Bible isn't perhaps the best tool for figuring out what the jews are up to.  The 10 commandments make enough sense, so it seems improbable to me that they snuck a taboo about homosexuality in just so they could divide and conquer whites with it at a later date.  Remember, were talking about 1% here.

There is also a tired argument that the Greeks and Romans etc. tolerated those who enjoyed dipping their sticks.  The Greeks and Romans for all their glory weren't perfect.  They had their gladiator games, animal sacrifices, wife-beatings, slavery, and other assorted BS that weren't exactly the hallmarks of civilization.  When we look back on the great civilizations, we need to be critical and see what did and didn't work.  Simply because the ancients got complacent and tolerated certain degeneracy is no reason why we should.

The author also finds it dangerous that those with homosexual desires are trapped in a homosexual lifestyle that prevents them from also affirming heterosexual desires such as marriage and family. What kind of lifestyle is he advocating then?  Dad stops at the motel before coming home from work, bones Steve up the ass, gives Steve a blow job, comes home and gives mother and children a kiss with the same dirty mouth, bones mom, gives her the AIDS he got from Steve... and everyone is happy!  Give me a break! “Homosexual desires” invariably means steamy orgasmic faggotry, and a woman would have to be pretty sick if she allowed her husband to carry on like that.  Faggot behaviour and family life don't mix.

Yeah, I can just see it now.  White nationalists carrying a banner in a 'gay pride' parade to show their support for white faggots.  We don't need that shit.

That all being said, our opposition to this degeneracy obviously isn't on the forefront of our racial struggle.  Nevertheless, when we take back our society, you can bet that the existing tolerance for these perverts (at least those we can openly identify) will come to a quick and bloody halt.